Originally: One Year Later Opposition Still Refuses to Participate in Consensus CEP
Press Release
Date: August 29, 2003
Contact: Michelle Karshan, Foreign Press Liaison
Telephone: (011509) 228-2059
Email: mkarshan@aol.com
One Year Later Opposition Still Refuses To Participate In Consensus
Provisional Electoral Council (CEP)
Haiti Organizes Constitutionally-Mandated Local And Legislation Elections For
2003
“The country should not die of institutional asphyxia.”
Alix Lamarque, President of the 2001 Provisional Electoral Council
Haiti’s Provisional Electoral Council, put into place in early 2001, recently
announced that local and parliamentary elections are tentatively scheduled
for November and December this year. Elections is 2003 are imperative to
prevent a constitutional void in mid-January 2004 when the terms of all the deputies
and one-third of the senate are constitutionally set to expire. To avoid this
crisis, all concerned branches of government are working to organize credible
elections, with the greatest possible participation of the electorate and
civil society institutions.
The head of the 2001 Provisional Electoral Council, Alix Lamarque, said his
council is obligated to move the electoral process forward, and outlined what
steps they have taken thus far including taking inventory of materials,
equipment, machinery, addressing security concerns, conducting an accounting,
preparing a proposed budget, training electoral personnel, and meeting with various
offices within the government with respect to their roles and responsibilities
in the oversight and planning of these elections.
Mr. Lamarque has also asked that the new consensus electoral council be
formed as quickly as possible to take over the task of overseeing elections, as
spelled out in the September 2002 OAS Resolution 822. At the moment that the
opposition sectors do nominate their representatives, or in the case of those
sectors who have already named their representatives but have refused to put
forward their person for the eventual installation of a new electoral council, the
existing electoral council of 2001 will step aside so the new consensus
electoral council can oversee the elections as planned.
President Jean-Bertrand Aristide and numerous representatives of Haiti’s
government continue to call on the opposition to comply with the terms of OAS
Resolution 822 and its Terms of Reference that calls on nine sectors to nominate
their representatives to sit on a new consensus electoral council to oversee
upcoming elections. President Aristide and the government have made numerous
concessions and overtures for a resolution to the two and a half year old
political crisis that arose solely over the method of calculation employed in the
election of seven Senate seats in the May 2001 elections.
Two and a half years into the political crisis and one year after the OAS
Resolution 822 called for the formation of a consensus electoral council, the
opposition continues to refuse to participate in its formation, although the
Resolution 822 recognized the urgency of holding elections in 2003. President
Aristide stated that it is “time to create the conditions by respecting the
Constitution of Haiti, the law of the country, and Resolution 822 of the OAS.” (See
below for history of Progress of the Electoral Council Under President
Aristide’s Administration.)
Prime Minister Yvon Neptune referring to the scheduling of elections
explained that, “The practice of constructing a democracy is achieved through respect
of the principles of the law.” The urgency at this juncture and recent growing
pressure from various sectors of society, obliges Haiti’s government to
organize elections, as constitutionally mandated.
Haiti’s government, still hopeful that the opposition will put forth their
representatives for the creation of a consensus electoral council, continues to
appeal to the opposition for their cooperation and compliance with OAS
Resolution 822 in doing so. President Aristide explained, “While we work to organize
elections with a [consensus] Provisional Electoral Council that will come out
of the negotiations in the context of [OAS] Resolutions 806 and 822, we ask
the current Provisional Electoral Council and all the other branches of
government?to do everything they can within the limits of the law too prepare the
ground for the consensus [electoral] council. The Haitian government has a moral
obligation to organize these elections so as to avoid an institutional void.”
As election momentum gains speed, some opposition parties continue to refuse
to participate, while others have already thrown their hats into the ring.
Enumerating the various political parties who have already come forward to
declare their readiness to participate in upcoming elections, Haiti’s Secretary of
State for Communications, Mario Dupuy, said Haiti would hold “Free and fair
elections.” Haiti’s Secretary of State for Public Security assured the electoral
council that there will be a climate of security and President Aristide added
that the police “will accompany all of the candidates so that all of them will
be able to run in the elections after leading their electoral campaigns in
complete freedom.” Dismy Cesar, a member of the President’s staff, added that,
“The international community will be able to follow them closely.”
The opposition has consistently claimed that they are not satisfied that a
climate of security has been established, but by refusing to name their
representatives to a new consensus electoral council, they are merely undermining that
which they claim to seek because it is the electoral council who is charged
with the planning and coordination of security for elections, together with the
police and the office of public security. The opposition, in not
participating, is bypassing their opportunity to partake in the security planning and
oversight of these elections.
Numerous government representatives have called on the international
community to respect Haiti’s need to comply with its Constitution by holding elections
now in an effort to not allow democratic structures, such as a functioning
parliament, be derailed. Citing numerous concessions made by the government and
the ruling party in an effort to resolve the political crisis, Deputy Rudy
Heriveaux said that the Haitian people have committed themselves to “the road of
compromise, consensus, and especially the road of true democracy. The role
of the United States today as a great friend of Haiti is to help us consolidate
democracy in the country?”
Further, the Secretary of State for Communications, called on the
international community to “get the parties that have not yet designated their members to
the Provisional Electoral Council to do so. And for those who have already
designated their members they should get them to be sworn in.”
Finally, Senator Gerald Gilles, referring to the opposition’s continued
refusal to make any concessions or comply with OAS resolutions, added this week
that, “The international community knows very well that in all democratic systems
elections must take place in order to reinforce a country’s democratic
structures…Respecting the minority is a democratic principle. But one must be
careful, because the minority should also respect the principles that allow the
holding of elections.”
Progress of the Electoral Council Under President Aristide’s Administration
February 2001
President Aristide is inaugurated, calls on the opposition to join in the
formation of the constitutionally mandated electoral council
The opposition desists
A representative and non-partisan provisional electoral council is named,
members include three medical doctors, a retired career diplomat, a public water
works expert, engineers, and university professors
June 2001
An OAS-brokered agreement between the government, the opposition parties,
Convergence and civil society is established to name a consensus CEP by a date
certain
President Aristide secures the resignation of all 9 members of the existing
CEP in preparation of the naming of the new consensus CEP
Convergence requests a delay in naming representative to the consensus CEP,
the OAS consents to the request; Convergence imposes new negotiating conditions
and the process collapses, the consensus CEP is not formed
September 2002
OAS Resolution 822 is passed, it provides for the formation of a new CEP with
one representative of each of the following sectors: Convergence; other
opposition parties; Lavalas; the Catholic Bishop’s Conference; the Protestant
Churches; the Episcopal Church; the human rights organizations through the Catholic
Justice and Peace Commission; the Chamber of Commerce and Industry; and the
judiciary
Resolution 822 provides that if one of the naming sectors refuses to
participate, the participating sectors may fill any empty seat
Resolution 822 recognizes the urgency that elections go forward in 2003
October – November 2002
Lavalas and the judiciary nominated councilors willing to serve on the CEP
Convergence and the other opposition parties refused to nominate councilors
to the CEP
The remaining five sectors, the Catholic, Protestant, Episcopal churches, the
Justice and Peace Commission and the Chamber of Commerce, nominated
councilors, but instructed these individuals to not participate in the CEP, until the
government satisfied two further requests
The government satisfied the two further requests within the two week-delay
set by the group of five, yet the nominated councilors were not instructed to
sit on the CEP
January 2003
Ministry of Foreign Affairs convened a meeting with the nine naming sectors
to move the process forward; Convergence and the other opposition parties
refused to attend
February 2003
President Aristide convened a meeting with the nine naming sectors and the
OAS Special Mission; Convergence and the other opposition parties again refused
to attend
The group of five continued to refuse to allow its nominees to join the CEP
President Aristide issued a decree for the formation of the CEP that includes
the nominees of the group of five, Lavalas and the judiciary, leaving the two
vacant seats open for Convergence and the opposition parties
However this did not induce/continued to refuse their nominees to come
forward for the installation of the new CEP
From March to July 2003 the 2001 CEP fulfilled their legal obligation to
prepare for local and parliamentary elections in 2003 as foreseen by both the
Constitution and Resolution 822 (terms of reference)
August 13 – seeing still no movement toward the installation of the OAS
consensus CEP, Alix Lamarque (President of the 2001 electoral council) stated that
now is the time to set the date and move forward to the next step to set the
elections
The 2001 CEP continues to stand ready to sede their seats to the OAS
consensus CEP when they do come forward.